Frontier Models
Anthropic Releases Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 With Record Coding Scores
The models deliver major benchmark gains in coding tasks along with cost reductions and differentiated safeguards, with one version open to the public and the other restricted to vetted organizations.
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 are versions of the same underlying model from Anthropic that provide advanced capabilities for coding and knowledge work with different safeguard configurations.
Anthropic released Claude Fable 5.1 on September 1, 2026. The model features a 1 million token context window and a maximum output of 128 thousand tokens. Pricing stands at 10 dollars per million tokens for input and 50 dollars per million tokens for output.
Claude Fable 5.1 is generally available to the public. Claude Mythos 5.1 is available only through trusted access programs for vetted organizations in cybersecurity and life sciences.
What are the key specifications of Claude Fable 5.1?
Claude Fable 5.1 defaults to high effort in Claude Code and medium in other interfaces. Cache reads for Claude Fable 5.1 cost a quarter of the prior price.
How do the benchmark scores compare to previous models?
Claude Fable 5.1 scores 52.6 percent on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 compared to 24.7 percent for the prior model. On Terminal-Bench 4.0 Claude Fable 5.1 achieves 55.8 percent accuracy versus 42.0 percent previously.
Claude Mythos 5.1 reaches 60.9 percent on coding benchmarks. These scores position the models as leaders in terminal based coding evaluations.
| Model | Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Typical Cost Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 52.6% | 55.8% | ~25% |
| Claude Mythos 5.1 | Not specified | 60.9% | Not specified |
What cost reductions are associated with Claude Fable 5.1?
Cache reads for Claude Fable 5.1 cost a quarter of the prior price. This change results in approximately 25 percent lower typical workload costs compared to Fable 5.
How do the safeguards differ between the models?
In cybersecurity the newest safeguards block 60 percent fewer false positives than before. The biology safeguards intervene on benign requests 85 percent less often than the ones launched with Fable 5.
What expert reactions have emerged regarding the models?
In internal benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 solves more of our coding problems than Fable 5 or Opus 5, and achieves state of the art on trading intuition. While prior models became hard to follow the longer they worked, Fable 5.1 remains readable over long, multi-step tasks.Craig Falls, Head of Quantitative Research
What are the market implications of these releases?
Claude Mythos 5.1 targets organizations in cybersecurity and life sciences through trusted access programs. Project Glasswing participants can access the capabilities of Claude Mythos 5.1.
The cost reductions make the models more viable for extended use in coding tasks across multiple sectors.
What comes next in the development of these models?
Anthropic continues to focus on refining safeguards for safe frontier deployment in sensitive fields.
- Assess eligibility for trusted access programs for Mythos 5.1.
- Evaluate integration with existing coding workflows using the new context window.
- Monitor updates on further benchmark improvements from Anthropic.
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the publicly available version with standard safeguards. Claude Mythos 5.1 is the same underlying model with enhanced safeguards and is limited to trusted access programs for vetted organizations in cybersecurity and life sciences.
Sources
- Anthropic — Benchmark scores and cost reductions for Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1
- Anthropic — Details on safeguards for Mythos 5.1 and comparison to Fable 5.1
- Anthropic — Release date, specifications, and availability of Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1
- Anthropic — 75% cheaper (quarter of the cost) — Cache read pricing reduction for Claude Fable 5.1